British universities will soon take on a legal obligation to protect “impressionable young minds” from the lure of extremism and radicalization as part of the government’s ‘Prevent’ counter-terrorism strategy.
Some university heads and student bodies have criticized Cameron’s plans, warning they will hinder free speech and prevent universities from hosting certain speakers. Others have been more welcoming, saying higher education bodies have a role to play in countering extremism.
The government’s new counter-extremism measures, set to be implemented next week, will require university staff to vet speakers and ensure that those who hold extremist views are balanced by an opposing argument expressed at the same event.
Higher education outlets will also need to train employees to identify and offer support to young people deemed vulnerable to radicalization. Institutions found to be resisting these safeguards will be forced to introduce them under a court order.
Speaking ahead of Thursday’s taskforce summit, Cameron argued all public institutions must play their part in challenging extremist activities.
“It is not about oppressing free speech or stifling academic freedom: it is about making sure that radical views and ideas are not given the oxygen they need to flourish,” he said.
“Schools, universities and colleges, more than anywhere else, have a duty to protect impressionable young minds and ensure that our young people are given every opportunity to reach their potential.”
What do you think?
What is an 'extremist' view? Who decides?
What is the role of a university?
What value should be given to academic freedom?
What is the purpose of education?
Read the article in full here
It is proposed that universities should have a legal obligation to protect "impressionable young minds" from the lure of extremist views